Triple
T30430887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jimmy Egan |
E774160
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyRelationTheme |
P179942
|
FINISHED |
| Object | police family |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: police family | Statement: [Jimmy Egan, familyRelationTheme, police family]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: familyRelationTheme Context triple: [Jimmy Egan, familyRelationTheme, police family]
-
A.
familyAspect
Indicates a relationship where one entity is characterized by a particular familial role, status, or aspect in relation to another entity.
-
B.
familyBonds
Indicates the existence and nature of familial relationships or kinship ties between entities.
-
C.
interFamilyRelations
Indicates relationships or interactions that occur between different families or family units.
-
D.
familyConnectionTo
Indicates a familial relationship or bond that exists between two entities, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
-
E.
familyRelationNote
Indicates a descriptive note or annotation that provides additional context or clarification about a specified family relationship between entities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22492d2a88190995ce8745d9becaa |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f72921cf2c8190909bb53f78bcc890 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7283d8cec8190b524c144948bc4ec |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:49 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f72920c6208190aa4aba6cb6193109 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:06 p.m.