Triple

T30426472
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 2197 E774044 entity
Predicate statusInRFCIndex P194993 FINISHED
Object Obsoleted RFC LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Obsoleted RFC | Statement: [RFC 2197, statusInRFCIndex, Obsoleted RFC]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInRFCIndex
Context triple: [RFC 2197, statusInRFCIndex, Obsoleted RFC]
  • A. statusInSI
    Indicates that an entity’s status or condition is specified according to the International System of Units (SI) or an SI-based standard.
  • B. statusInRDF11
    Indicates the status or standing of something within the context of RDF 1.1 (e.g., its approval, stability, or specification state in that version of RDF).
  • C. standardizationStatus
    Indicates the current stage or condition of an entity in a formal standardization process (e.g., proposed, under review, approved, deprecated).
  • D. statusInAPA
    Indicates the status or standing that one entity holds within, or as defined by, the APA (American Psychological Association) context.
  • E. statusIndicates
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22491ba248190b9a4776ca8e42d02 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd974d75e08190af46b1d608769f3b completed May 8, 2026, 7:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd94ff792c8190bedf4a639d3da809 completed May 8, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd974c0e8481909fdd312897c647b3 completed May 8, 2026, 7:57 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:06 p.m.