Triple

T30405063
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Synergistic Processing Element E773455 entity
Predicate hasLocalMemory P85942 FINISHED
Object 256 KB local store LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 256 KB local store | Statement: [Synergistic Processing Element, hasLocalMemory, 256 KB local store]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalMemory
Context triple: [Synergistic Processing Element, hasLocalMemory, 256 KB local store]
  • A. hasMemoryIn
    Indicates that an entity possesses or stores memory, information, or experiences within a specified context, location, or medium.
  • B. hasMemorySlot chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific memory slot or storage location for holding information or data.
  • C. hasExternalMemory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or utilizes memory resources located outside its own primary or internal storage.
  • D. hasMemoryStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s memory (such as availability, usage, or health).
  • E. hasUserMemory
    Indicates that an entity maintains or is associated with stored information about a specific user.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2248facd48190b183c3f3ca6daef7 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd19f791f48190bbb6f6047f9ddc59 completed May 7, 2026, 11:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd0df365948190bc9bfc7ffd46acd8 completed May 7, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:03 p.m.