Triple

T30390966
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blue–Green Rivalry E773082 entity
Predicate isAlsoContestedIn P28246 FINISHED
Object other NCAA sports LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other NCAA sports | Statement: [Blue–Green Rivalry, isAlsoContestedIn, other NCAA sports]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAlsoContestedIn
Context triple: [Blue–Green Rivalry, isAlsoContestedIn, other NCAA sports]
  • A. alsoContestedIn chosen
    Indicates that the same issue, claim, or matter is being disputed or challenged in another context, case, or proceeding as well.
  • B. areContestedIn
    Indicates that something is the subject of dispute, challenge, or competition within a particular context, event, or process.
  • C. wasContestedIn
    Indicates that an event, position, or decision was the subject of competition, dispute, or challenge within a particular context or proceeding.
  • D. laterContestedBy
    Indicates that an earlier claim, decision, or statement is subsequently challenged or disputed by another party or source.
  • E. contestedBy
    Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2248ef0a48190aa54d4d8ac3e5758 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6859bbd7c81909084682a99f2b9be completed May 2, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678d019fc8190913662cd2f87b857 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:02 p.m.