Triple

T30390525
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Miles Tuck E773067 entity
Predicate hasChildrenBeforeImmortality P192299 FINISHED
Object two children LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two children | Statement: [Miles Tuck, hasChildrenBeforeImmortality, two children]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChildrenBeforeImmortality
Context triple: [Miles Tuck, hasChildrenBeforeImmortality, two children]
  • A. lostChildrenDueToImmortality
    Indicates that an entity has experienced the loss of their children as a consequence of their own immortality.
  • B. hasPerspectiveOnImmortality
    Indicates that one entity holds a particular view, stance, or interpretation regarding the concept of immortality.
  • C. deniedImmortalityBy
    Indicates that one entity refused, prevented, or revoked the possibility of immortality for another entity.
  • D. becomesImmortalIn
    Indicates that an entity transitions into a state of immortality within a specified context, time, or medium.
  • E. immortality
    Indicates that an entity possesses the quality of never dying or ceasing to exist, persisting indefinitely through time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2248ef0a48190aa54d4d8ac3e5758 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd05ba6b2c81909c62b46237d10365 completed May 7, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd03039e48819082b6e12c5453885a completed May 7, 2026, 9:24 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd05b965608190a3666410b9f8e125 completed May 7, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:02 p.m.