Triple
T30390409
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jesse Tuck |
E773064
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPerspectiveOnImmortality |
P190353
|
FINISHED |
| Object | optimistic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: optimistic | Statement: [Jesse Tuck, hasPerspectiveOnImmortality, optimistic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPerspectiveOnImmortality Context triple: [Jesse Tuck, hasPerspectiveOnImmortality, optimistic]
-
A.
hasViewOnAfterlife
Indicates that an entity holds a particular belief, opinion, or perspective regarding the nature of the afterlife.
-
B.
immortality
Indicates that an entity possesses the quality of never dying or ceasing to exist, persisting indefinitely through time.
-
C.
reasonForImmortality
Indicates that one entity specifies the cause, source, or mechanism by which another entity possesses immortality.
-
D.
reflectsOnMortality
Indicates that an entity contemplates or becomes aware of the inevitability and nature of death, often prompting existential reflection.
-
E.
causeOfImmortality
Indicates that the subject is the reason or source for the object's immortality.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2248ef0a48190aa54d4d8ac3e5758 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc4b700748190ae00b21d09c96695 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0f9d3d881908a049475182fb039 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcc4b5f22c8190b8b256adbdc2570c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:02 p.m.