Triple
T30386046
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XO-1 |
E772957
|
entity |
| Predicate | industrialDesignBy |
P184
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yves Béhar |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yves Béhar | Statement: [XO-1, industrialDesignBy, Yves Béhar]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: industrialDesignBy Context triple: [XO-1, industrialDesignBy, Yves Béhar]
-
A.
designedIn
Indicates that something was created, planned, or conceived during a particular time period or at a specific location.
-
B.
worldDesign
Indicates the relationship by which an entity is responsible for creating, shaping, or specifying the structure, rules, and features of a fictional or virtual world.
-
C.
designedWith
Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
-
D.
designedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the creator, planner, or architect responsible for the form or structure of another entity.
-
E.
designsBy
Indicates that one entity is the creator or designer responsible for the conception or design of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2248ef0a48190aa54d4d8ac3e5758 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6851e482881908316e652c410e0ab |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e40af9881908de3a4aa15f70a83 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:01 p.m.