Triple
T30369805
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SECAM |
E772517
|
entity |
| Predicate | concurrentStandard |
P169741
|
FINISHED |
| Object | PAL |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: PAL | Statement: [SECAM, concurrentStandard, PAL]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concurrentStandard Context triple: [SECAM, concurrentStandard, PAL]
-
A.
coreStandard
Indicates that something conforms to, is defined by, or is governed by a central or foundational standard or specification.
-
B.
standardParallelType
Indicates the type or method by which the standard parallel(s) are defined or specified in a coordinate reference or map projection system.
-
C.
jointStandardOf
Indicates that two or more entities share responsibility for defining, maintaining, or adhering to the same standard or set of rules.
-
D.
baseStandard
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational or reference standard upon which another entity is defined, measured, or evaluated.
-
E.
standardWithin
Indicates that one entity conforms to, or falls within the limits of, a specified standard defined by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2248d71408190aec0d5c2001b1cff |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f682836d308190b22a0efc893e7a45 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e40af9881908de3a4aa15f70a83 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f67f7e116c819099aec724e9ef3763 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:59 p.m.