Triple
T30369773
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | BITC |
E772516
|
entity |
| Predicate | isUsefulFor |
P98
|
FINISHED |
| Object | quality control |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: quality control | Statement: [BITC, isUsefulFor, quality control]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isUsefulFor Context triple: [BITC, isUsefulFor, quality control]
-
A.
isSometimesUsedFor
Indicates that something serves a particular purpose or function on some occasions, but not consistently or exclusively.
-
B.
usedFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
C.
potentialUse
Indicates that one entity could be used for, or is suitable for, a particular function, purpose, or application involving another entity.
-
D.
isBelievedToBeUsedFor
Indicates that something is thought or assumed to serve a particular purpose or function, without certainty.
-
E.
isSuitableFor
Indicates that one entity is appropriate, fitting, or well-matched for use, application, or association with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2248d71408190aec0d5c2001b1cff |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68a16debc8190a12f5f65ced055d7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6860def1c81909d79e1f088c4b5e5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:59 p.m.