Triple
T30357570
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sony MZ-1 |
E772188
|
entity |
| Predicate | editingCapability |
P169092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rename tracks |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rename tracks | Statement: [Sony MZ-1, editingCapability, rename tracks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: editingCapability Context triple: [Sony MZ-1, editingCapability, rename tracks]
-
A.
editingIs
Indicates that one entity is performing or undergoing the process of editing another entity.
-
B.
editingMode
Indicates that an entity is currently in, or associated with, a state where its content or properties can be modified or edited.
-
C.
editingParadigm
Indicates the method or style of editing applied to content, such as the structural approach, workflow, or conceptual framework guiding how edits are performed.
-
D.
editingBody
Indicates that one entity is serving as the editorial body responsible for reviewing, modifying, or overseeing the content or work of another entity.
-
E.
editingInterface
Indicates that one entity serves as the user-facing tool or environment through which another entity can be edited or modified.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2248c6f5c8190a6177842bf791a3c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6823fe8c48190a8911627f79dd949 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f678d019fc8190913662cd2f87b857 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f679496c188190ba585792f987a1f4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:57 p.m.