Triple
T30347430
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nadeko Sengoku |
E771902
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAffliction |
P4720
|
FINISHED |
| Object | snake aberration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: snake aberration | Statement: [Nadeko Sengoku, hasAffliction, snake aberration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAffliction Context triple: [Nadeko Sengoku, hasAffliction, snake aberration]
-
A.
hasAssociatedDisease
Indicates that an entity is linked to, or commonly occurs with, a particular disease or medical condition.
-
B.
hadCondition
Indicates that an entity experienced or was diagnosed with a particular medical or health-related condition.
-
C.
hasPossibleSymptom
Indicates that an entity (such as a condition or disease) may be associated with a particular symptom that can potentially occur.
-
D.
hasRiskFactorFor
Indicates that one entity contributes to or increases the likelihood of another entity experiencing a particular risk or adverse outcome.
-
E.
hasHealthConcern
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a specific health-related issue, condition, or concern associated with it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2248b9a208190bc3e6804acd5afd6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68209227c81909b613d5bc9426038 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f678ce54b081908c26edfd49e39c60 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:56 p.m.