Triple
T30300139
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dictionary (Swift) |
E770631
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresKeyConformance |
P5499
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hashable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hashable | Statement: [Dictionary (Swift), requiresKeyConformance, Hashable]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresKeyConformance Context triple: [Dictionary (Swift), requiresKeyConformance, Hashable]
-
A.
requiresKeyAndNonceUniqueness
Indicates that the operation or protocol demands both a unique key and a unique nonce for each use or session to ensure security.
-
B.
hasConformanceRequirements
chosen
Indicates that an entity is subject to specific rules, standards, or criteria that it must satisfy or comply with.
-
C.
requiresSignatureOf
Indicates that one entity must obtain or depend on the formal signature or signed approval of another entity.
-
D.
definesConformanceRequirementsFor
Indicates that one entity specifies the rules, criteria, or conditions that another entity must satisfy to be considered conformant.
-
E.
mustAdhereTo
Indicates that an entity is obligated to comply with, follow, or conform to a specified rule, standard, or requirement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224881b948190b8c4921b250a44a3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe031bc6208190860099aef72d8dcb |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe014c8b388190b5d4e0cb95ee2be5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:48 p.m.