Triple

T30299741
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Network framework E770623 entity
Predicate exposesType P169058 FINISHED
Object NWConnection NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NWConnection | Statement: [Network framework, exposesType, NWConnection]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exposesType
Context triple: [Network framework, exposesType, NWConnection]
  • A. exposureType
    Indicates the specific manner or context in which one entity is exposed to another entity, condition, or influence.
  • B. exposesTo
    Indicates that one entity subjects another entity to contact with or influence from something, typically involving risk, effect, or experience.
  • C. exposes
    Indicates making something visible, known, or vulnerable by removing cover, concealment, or protection.
  • D. exposedThrough
    Indicates that something becomes revealed, accessible, or affected as a result of passing through or being subjected to another thing or medium.
  • E. exportsType
    Indicates that one entity sends or sells a particular type or category of goods, services, or resources to another entity across a boundary (such as international borders).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224881b948190b8c4921b250a44a3 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6813976048190be49bb86744b2fb2 completed May 2, 2026, 10:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6760216108190bbb708d53a6c2c25 completed May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f676c35f3481909b9ba18a5662d6ce completed May 2, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:48 p.m.