Triple
T30280637
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Conquest |
E770079
|
entity |
| Predicate | artDirectionNominee |
P139913
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cedric Gibbons |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cedric Gibbons | Statement: [Conquest, artDirectionNominee, Cedric Gibbons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artDirectionNominee Context triple: [Conquest, artDirectionNominee, Cedric Gibbons]
-
A.
artDirectorNominee
chosen
Indicates that an entity is nominated for an art director role or award in relation to another entity (such as a film, show, or production).
-
B.
bestArtDirectionWinner
Indicates that the subject is the winner of an award for best art direction in a given context or event.
-
C.
artDirectionBy
Indicates that the visual and stylistic design of a work is overseen or created by a specified art director.
-
D.
nominatedWork
Indicates that a particular work (such as a book, film, or artwork) has been put forward as a candidate for an award, honor, or recognition.
-
E.
nominatedIn
Indicates that an entity has been formally put forward as a candidate for an award, position, or recognition within a specific event, context, or time period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224868fa8819099127eaf8855a28f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68103dd1c819096f5357751f9c566 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6760216108190bbb708d53a6c2c25 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:45 p.m.