Triple

T30273614
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Morena E769870 entity
Predicate hasElectoralSuccess P7692 FINISHED
Object federal level in Mexico LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal level in Mexico | Statement: [Morena, hasElectoralSuccess, federal level in Mexico]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasElectoralSuccess
Context triple: [Morena, hasElectoralSuccess, federal level in Mexico]
  • A. electoralSuccess chosen
    Indicates that an entity has achieved a favorable or winning outcome in an election or electoral process.
  • B. hadElectoralStrength
    Indicates that an entity possessed a certain level or degree of political or electoral support, influence, or voting power within a specified context or period.
  • C. hasElectoralAuthority
    Indicates that an entity possesses the official power or legal right to oversee, manage, or make binding decisions about electoral processes or outcomes.
  • D. hasElectoralVoteIn
    Indicates that an entity possesses or receives electoral votes within a specified election or jurisdiction.
  • E. electedWith
    Indicates that one entity attained an elected position or office together with, or as part of the same electoral outcome as, another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224856d9881908c7f0dd64f059672 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6e6029a10819098ff21f58079e70e completed May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6e3d5e8188190b1e1c2e5d1b77031 completed May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:44 p.m.