Triple

T30265940
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Louella E769641 entity
Predicate isConsideredCombinationOf P175677 FINISHED
Object Louise NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Louise | Statement: [Louella, isConsideredCombinationOf, Louise]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConsideredCombinationOf
Context triple: [Louella, isConsideredCombinationOf, Louise]
  • A. introducedFromCombinationOf
    Indicates that something is newly created or arises as a result of combining two or more other entities or elements.
  • B. isSubtractiveCombination
    Indicates that one entity is formed or derived by subtracting one or more components, values, or parts of another entity.
  • C. knownForCombining
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is recognized or notable for bringing together or merging multiple elements, entities, or aspects into a unified whole.
  • D. typicalCombinationWith
    Indicates that one entity is commonly or characteristically used, found, or occurs together in combination with another entity.
  • E. originalCombinationFor
    Indicates that one entity is the initial or source combination from which another combined entity is derived or constructed.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224856d9881908c7f0dd64f059672 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d74b20a48190900dda1014cc13a8 completed May 3, 2026, 5:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d26ceb08819091c71c001e954936 completed May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6d6a482fc8190b526291cd99b8696 completed May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:43 p.m.