Triple

T30232335
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sandy Woodrow E768662 entity
Predicate complicitWith P12435 FINISHED
Object Tessa Quayle murder cover-up LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tessa Quayle murder cover-up | Statement: [Sandy Woodrow, complicitWith, Tessa Quayle murder cover-up]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: complicitWith
Context triple: [Sandy Woodrow, complicitWith, Tessa Quayle murder cover-up]
  • A. complicitIn chosen
    Indicates involvement in or knowing participation in a wrongful, illegal, or unethical act carried out by another party.
  • B. allegesCollaborationWith
    Indicates that one party claims or asserts that another party has worked together or cooperated with a specified entity.
  • C. actedTogetherWith
    Indicates that two entities participated in the same performance or production, collaborating or appearing together in an acting context.
  • D. partnerInCrime
    Indicates a relationship where two or more entities collaborate closely in committing or planning wrongful, illicit, or mischievous acts together.
  • E. cooperatedInExchangeFor
    Indicates that one entity collaborated or assisted another specifically in return for some form of compensation, benefit, or agreed-upon exchange.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2248108208190be60bf1af343ce70 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 completed May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f completed May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:36 p.m.