Triple

T3022519
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1998 California gubernatorial election E82494 entity
Predicate featuredIncumbentGovernorRunning P44681 FINISHED
Object no LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no | Statement: [1998 California gubernatorial election, featuredIncumbentGovernorRunning, no]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuredIncumbentGovernorRunning
Context triple: [1998 California gubernatorial election, featuredIncumbentGovernorRunning, no]
  • A. incumbent
    Indicates that an entity currently holds a particular position, office, or role at the present time.
  • B. incumbentBeforeElection
    Indicates that the subject was already holding the relevant office or position prior to the specified election.
  • C. incumbentOpponent
    Indicates that one entity is the current officeholder while the other is their electoral challenger for that same position.
  • D. lastIncumbent
    Indicates that the subject is the most recent person or entity to have held a particular position, office, or role before the current one.
  • E. currentGovernor
    Indicates that one entity is the person who presently holds the office of governor of the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1fb34081908c1b873e2b7273e1 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9a963034819093d96566e9b0cea9 completed March 8, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad961c430c8190ac48f2e3c7e7c649 completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ad97f6af3881909f4547967384114c completed March 8, 2026, 3:38 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3 p.m.