Triple
T30184137
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Council Decision 2017/477/CFSP |
E767286
|
entity |
| Predicate | modifiesProvisionsOf |
P30689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP | Statement: [Council Decision 2017/477/CFSP, modifiesProvisionsOf, Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modifiesProvisionsOf Context triple: [Council Decision 2017/477/CFSP, modifiesProvisionsOf, Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP]
-
A.
claimsToModify
Indicates that one entity asserts it can change, alter, or adjust another entity or its properties.
-
B.
amendedFor
Indicates that one entity has been modified or revised specifically to address, correct, or accommodate another entity.
-
C.
confirmedProvisionsOf
Indicates that one entity has formally verified and accepted the validity or accuracy of specific provisions, terms, or clauses associated with another entity.
-
D.
governingDocumentToAmend
Indicates that one document serves as the governing document that is subject to amendment by another specified action or instrument.
-
E.
legalAmendment
chosen
Indicates a formal change or modification made to an existing law, regulation, or legal document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2247cc3d88190811dec3face94bf5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67f43c8388190a0fce4ef4e392274 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c7a4588190837854f3ef61e6bf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:27 p.m.