Triple
T30181762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GNER |
E767219
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterFranchiseAuthority |
P144446
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Strategic Rail Authority |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Strategic Rail Authority | Statement: [GNER, laterFranchiseAuthority, Strategic Rail Authority]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterFranchiseAuthority Context triple: [GNER, laterFranchiseAuthority, Strategic Rail Authority]
-
A.
laterFranchiseHolder
chosen
Indicates that one entity became the franchise holder of something at a later time than another entity, succeeding the earlier franchise holder.
-
B.
intendedFranchise
Indicates that one entity is planned or designated to become part of, or operate under, the franchise of another entity.
-
C.
originalFranchiseOf
Indicates that one entity is the source or originating franchise from which another franchise, adaptation, or derivative work is based or derived.
-
D.
franchiseContinuedAs
Indicates that an existing franchise was succeeded or carried on by another franchise, continuing its storyline, brand, or concept.
-
E.
formerFranchise
Indicates that an entity previously held a franchise relationship with another entity but no longer does.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2247cc3d88190811dec3face94bf5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fecb4d02f881909a9ee97ce98000d5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fec9846c1c8190b317f0711f0755db |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:26 p.m.