Triple
T30165595
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wald test |
E766782
|
entity |
| Predicate | nullHypothesisForm |
P86344
|
FINISHED |
| Object | parameter equals specified value |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parameter equals specified value | Statement: [Wald test, nullHypothesisForm, parameter equals specified value]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nullHypothesisForm Context triple: [Wald test, nullHypothesisForm, parameter equals specified value]
-
A.
hasNullHypothesis
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or defined in terms of, a specific null hypothesis in a statistical or experimental context.
-
B.
basisOfHypothesis
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational evidence, rationale, or starting point for formulating a particular hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
-
C.
hypothesis
Indicates that a statement or proposition is tentatively assumed to be true and is subject to testing, evaluation, or proof.
-
D.
hasAlternativeHypothesis
Indicates that an entity is associated with another entity that serves as a different or competing hypothesis to explain the same phenomenon or data.
-
E.
Null
Indicates that no specific relationship or action is defined or applicable in this context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2247a968881909d79c18f2bfcb275 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67f073dbc8190a42f4c71ad2f7de3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c7a4588190837854f3ef61e6bf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:23 p.m.