Triple
T30158444
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Betty Crocker |
E766586
|
entity |
| Predicate | brandSuccessorCompany |
P156908
|
FINISHED |
| Object | General Mills |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: General Mills | Statement: [Betty Crocker, brandSuccessorCompany, General Mills]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandSuccessorCompany Context triple: [Betty Crocker, brandSuccessorCompany, General Mills]
-
A.
successorBrandOwner
chosen
Indicates that one brand owner has taken over ownership or control of a brand from a previous brand owner, acting as its legal or commercial successor.
-
B.
successorManufacturer
Indicates that one manufacturer has taken over, replaced, or continued the role or operations of another manufacturer as its successor.
-
C.
successorBranding
Indicates that one brand has replaced or continued another brand as its subsequent or updated identity.
-
D.
hasCorporateSuccessor
Indicates that one corporate entity is the legal successor to another, inheriting its rights, obligations, or continuity of business.
-
E.
successorBrandScope
Indicates that one brand has replaced or followed another brand in scope, such as in market presence, ownership, or official continuity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22479cd088190ab4c6f3fce39d1c5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69dfdda708190be290c7bec205445 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69d1a37e081908d1d86b90ff502bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:21 p.m.