Triple
T30152284
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WHOIS protocol |
E766425
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDesignLimitation |
P99
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lack of standardized output format |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lack of standardized output format | Statement: [WHOIS protocol, hasDesignLimitation, lack of standardized output format]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDesignLimitation Context triple: [WHOIS protocol, hasDesignLimitation, lack of standardized output format]
-
A.
hasLimitation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
-
B.
showsLimitationOf
Indicates that one entity reveals, demonstrates, or makes apparent the limitations, weaknesses, or constraints of another entity.
-
C.
hasCommunicationLimitation
Indicates that an entity is subject to some restriction, constraint, or reduced capacity in its ability to communicate.
-
D.
hasDesignTradeoff
Indicates that one design choice involves compromises or conflicting benefits and drawbacks relative to other possible designs.
-
E.
hasAccessibilityLimitation
Indicates that an entity is subject to specific constraints or limitations affecting its accessibility or ease of access.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22479cd088190ab4c6f3fce39d1c5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd91a5dad8819093eeeef527027890 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd8f65fe9081908902500a3228d935 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:20 p.m.