Triple
T30152257
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WHOIS protocol |
E766425
|
entity |
| Predicate | previouslyDefinedInRFC |
P33255
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 954 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 954 | Statement: [WHOIS protocol, previouslyDefinedInRFC, RFC 954]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previouslyDefinedInRFC Context triple: [WHOIS protocol, previouslyDefinedInRFC, RFC 954]
-
A.
deprecatedInRFC
Indicates that a specification, feature, or practice has been formally marked as deprecated within a particular RFC document.
-
B.
previouslyDefinedIn
chosen
Indicates that something has been defined or introduced earlier in time or in a prior context relative to the current reference point.
-
C.
originalRfc
Indicates that something is the initial or authoritative RFC (Request for Comments) document from which a specification, standard, or later revision originates.
-
D.
hasRFC
Indicates that an entity is associated with, described by, or defined in a specific RFC (Request for Comments) document.
-
E.
accountingDefinedInRFC
Indicates that the accounting mechanism or specification is formally defined or described within a particular RFC (Request for Comments) document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22479cd088190ab4c6f3fce39d1c5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdb31800508190beec15adb9bbd292 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdb19c381c8190bafb2f565da097f1 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:20 p.m.