Triple

T30150782
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Victor Sassoon E766388 entity
Predicate knownForInterest P66206 FINISHED
Object thoroughbred horse racing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: thoroughbred horse racing | Statement: [Victor Sassoon, knownForInterest, thoroughbred horse racing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: knownForInterest
Context triple: [Victor Sassoon, knownForInterest, thoroughbred horse racing]
  • A. subjectInterest chosen
    Indicates that the subject has an interest in, or is concerned with, the object.
  • B. recognizedInterest
    Indicates that one entity has formally acknowledged or identified another entity’s interest in something as valid or relevant.
  • C. primaryInterest
    Indicates that one entity is the main or most significant focus of attention, concern, or engagement for another entity.
  • D. nowKnownFor
    Indicates that an entity is currently recognized or notable for a particular role, attribute, achievement, or association.
  • E. namedForKnownFor
    Indicates that one entity is named after another entity specifically because that other entity is notable or recognized for something.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22479cd088190ab4c6f3fce39d1c5 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6db1f3ec48190a82e7d893d3c76ba completed May 3, 2026, 5:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d82adfa481908a5e196d2e18c73f completed May 3, 2026, 5:07 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:20 p.m.