Triple
T301409
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hanoi |
E6204
|
entity |
| Predicate | populationRankInVietnam |
P11271
|
FINISHED |
| Object | second largest city after Ho Chi Minh City |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second largest city after Ho Chi Minh City | Statement: [Hanoi, populationRankInVietnam, second largest city after Ho Chi Minh City]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: populationRankInVietnam Context triple: [Hanoi, populationRankInVietnam, second largest city after Ho Chi Minh City]
-
A.
populationRank
Indicates the relative position of an entity in an ordered list based on the size of its population.
-
B.
hasPopulationRank
Indicates the relative position of an entity in an ordered list based on the size of its population.
-
C.
areaRank
Indicates the relative ordering or position of an entity based on the size of its area compared to others.
-
D.
populationRankInVirginia
Indicates the relative position of an entity in terms of population size compared to other entities within Virginia.
-
E.
rankByPopulationInUS
Indicates the relative ordering of entities based on the size of their populations within the United States.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79230508190b912ecb555aae17e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea2fba548190a5aeb1597dca96bd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e93aff048190a633c8ae2b76a41f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea2af1388190b93235602ace679e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.