Triple
T30128632
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Theory of Confounding |
E765767
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConceptualPredecessor |
P50919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | blocking |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: blocking | Statement: [The Theory of Confounding, hasConceptualPredecessor, blocking]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConceptualPredecessor Context triple: [The Theory of Confounding, hasConceptualPredecessor, blocking]
-
A.
predecessorInConcept
chosen
Indicates that one concept temporally or logically comes before another in a sequence or developmental progression.
-
B.
hasPredecessorRoleIn
Indicates that one role functioned earlier in time or sequence relative to another role within the same context or position.
-
C.
successorConcept
Indicates that one concept directly follows and replaces another in a sequence, versioning, or conceptual progression.
-
D.
contributedToPredecessorOf
Indicates that one entity contributed to or influenced another entity that came before a specified successor in a sequence or lineage.
-
E.
citedAsPrecursorOf
Indicates that one entity is referenced or recognized as an earlier work, influence, or foundation that contributed to the development of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22477d1a081908df2b7e6ed16859d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00d508290081909f3d5dfbb2e80c8e |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00d49da4cc81909566ad286ec22292 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:14 p.m.