Triple
T30127540
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Manna Machine |
E765739
|
entity |
| Predicate | interpretsAsTechnology |
P190351
|
FINISHED |
| Object | descriptions of the Ark of the Covenant |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: descriptions of the Ark of the Covenant | Statement: [The Manna Machine, interpretsAsTechnology, descriptions of the Ark of the Covenant]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretsAsTechnology Context triple: [The Manna Machine, interpretsAsTechnology, descriptions of the Ark of the Covenant]
-
A.
isKeyTechnologyIn
Indicates that one technology plays a central, enabling, or foundational role within another specified context, system, or domain.
-
B.
associatedWithTechnology
Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, involved with, or utilizes a particular technology.
-
C.
isTechnical
Indicates that an entity possesses specialized technical knowledge, skills, or characteristics related to technology, engineering, or applied sciences.
-
D.
inUniverseTechnologyOf
Indicates that a technology exists within, and is part of, the fictional universe or setting associated with a given entity.
-
E.
licensedTechnologyFrom
Indicates that one entity has obtained the legal right to use another entity’s technology through a licensing agreement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22477d1a081908df2b7e6ed16859d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc4b700748190ae00b21d09c96695 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0f9d3d881908a049475182fb039 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcc4b5f22c8190b8b256adbdc2570c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:14 p.m.