Triple
T30107550
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Poem 5 (Vivamus, mea Lesbia, atque amemus) |
E765172
|
entity |
| Predicate | attitudeTowardCritics |
P159371
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dismissive |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dismissive | Statement: [Poem 5 (Vivamus, mea Lesbia, atque amemus), attitudeTowardCritics, dismissive]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: attitudeTowardCritics Context triple: [Poem 5 (Vivamus, mea Lesbia, atque amemus), attitudeTowardCritics, dismissive]
-
A.
typeOfCriticism
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of criticism directed at another entity or subject.
-
B.
attitudeTowardOthers
chosen
Indicates the nature or disposition of one entity’s feelings, judgments, or behavioral stance toward other entities.
-
C.
hasCriticism
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
-
D.
cultAttitude
Indicates the stance, beliefs, or disposition that a cult or cult-like group holds toward a particular entity, idea, or practice.
-
E.
criticizesPosition
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval of, challenges, or points out flaws in another entity’s stance, viewpoint, or argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22475ad7c8190be7f9541044a0bbb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68a16debc8190a12f5f65ced055d7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6860def1c81909d79e1f088c4b5e5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:09 p.m.