Triple

T30104800
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cézanne’s L’Estaque landscapes E765101 entity
Predicate formalInnovation P146544 FINISHED
Object use of color to build form LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of color to build form | Statement: [Cézanne’s L’Estaque landscapes, formalInnovation, use of color to build form]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formalInnovation
Context triple: [Cézanne’s L’Estaque landscapes, formalInnovation, use of color to build form]
  • A. innovation
    Indicates the introduction or development of something new or significantly improved compared to existing methods, products, or ideas.
  • B. innovationFrom
    Indicates that something originates, arises, or is derived as an innovation from a particular source or prior entity.
  • C. innovationLevel
    Indicates the degree or extent to which something is new, original, or creatively advanced compared to existing norms or solutions.
  • D. usedInnovation
    Indicates that one entity applied or implemented an innovation (such as a new idea, method, or technology) in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. innovativeFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or introduces a novel, advanced, or uniquely improved feature compared to existing alternatives.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22474e4288190b5f895fe3974aa92 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6afebd7ec8190ab696f363d84abf0 completed May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aca3dedc81908b519d53d2909868 completed May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:09 p.m.