Triple
T30098343
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | King of Benoic |
E764926
|
entity |
| Predicate | timeOfCompositionOfLegends |
P134575
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 12th–15th centuries |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 12th–15th centuries | Statement: [King of Benoic, timeOfCompositionOfLegends, 12th–15th centuries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: timeOfCompositionOfLegends Context triple: [King of Benoic, timeOfCompositionOfLegends, 12th–15th centuries]
-
A.
legendaryPeriod
Indicates a time span associated with legends or mythic events rather than strictly historical chronology.
-
B.
chronologyWithinMythos
Indicates that one event, story, or element occurs at a specific position or order within the internal timeline of a particular mythos or fictional universe.
-
C.
timeInMyth
Indicates that an entity exists or occurs during a specific time period within a mythological narrative or tradition.
-
D.
dynastyOfComposition
Indicates the ruling dynasty or historical dynasty period during which a given composition was created or to which it is attributed.
-
E.
dateOfCompositionHypothesis
chosen
Indicates a hypothesized or uncertain date when something (such as a work or document) was composed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22474e4288190b5f895fe3974aa92 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7675b12848190a3569cfda29c5b0e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f762f4b59481909f70074f11825bfb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:07 p.m.