Triple

T30092716
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Korba Coalfield E764778 entity
Predicate previousAdministrativeStateUntil P30469 FINISHED
Object 2000 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2000 | Statement: [Korba Coalfield, previousAdministrativeStateUntil, 2000]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousAdministrativeStateUntil
Context triple: [Korba Coalfield, previousAdministrativeStateUntil, 2000]
  • A. previousMunicipalityStatus
    Indicates that one municipality previously held a particular municipal status or classification before a change occurred.
  • B. formerAdministrativeStatus
    Indicates that an entity previously held, but no longer holds, a particular administrative status or role.
  • C. previousStateName
    Indicates the name of the state that immediately preceded the current state in a process or state transition.
  • D. previousAdministrator
    Indicates that one entity formerly held an administrative role or position over another entity before the current administrator.
  • E. formerState chosen
    Indicates that an entity previously held the status or condition of a particular state but no longer does so.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22473c0fc8190a926a8051b3b378b completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdb04ed81c8190b8feea90c1c785a6 completed May 8, 2026, 9:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fda9d6c5148190a63205b6d9b0a1b4 completed May 8, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:06 p.m.