Triple
T30080571
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slumber Party |
E764443
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasElectropopElements |
P98420
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Slumber Party, hasElectropopElements, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasElectropopElements Context triple: [Slumber Party, hasElectropopElements, yes]
-
A.
hasElectronicBeat
Indicates that the associated music or audio features a rhythm or backing track produced using electronic instruments or digital sound processing.
-
B.
hasElectronicInfluences
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a work, style, or performance) is influenced by electronic music, sounds, or production techniques.
-
C.
hasEuphoricVocals
Indicates that the subject features or produces vocals characterized by intense happiness, excitement, or uplifting emotional expression.
-
D.
hasDancePopElements
Indicates that something incorporates stylistic or musical characteristics commonly associated with dance-pop.
-
E.
hasEDMElements
Indicates that something incorporates stylistic or structural elements characteristic of electronic dance music (EDM).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22472eee081909791dc372aa766e9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6df450014819099d118e5c2d697fa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de07836481908785cde9c511920b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:02 p.m.