Triple
T30080241
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Outrageous |
E764434
|
entity |
| Predicate | remixOfficial |
P66064
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Junkie XL remix |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Junkie XL remix | Statement: [Outrageous, remixOfficial, Junkie XL remix]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: remixOfficial Context triple: [Outrageous, remixOfficial, Junkie XL remix]
-
A.
remixTeam
Indicates that one entity is a team responsible for creating, modifying, or collaborating on a remix of another entity (such as a work, project, or artifact).
-
B.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
C.
remixFeatures
Indicates that one entity is a modified or reworked version of another, incorporating or altering features from the original.
-
D.
remixArtist
Indicates that one entity is the artist who created a remix version of a work originally produced by another entity.
-
E.
notableRemixBy
chosen
Indicates that one creative work has a particularly recognized or significant remix created by a specified artist or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22472eee081909791dc372aa766e9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67d4086c08190ac65ff5d29fa06dc |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f678ce54b081908c26edfd49e39c60 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:02 p.m.