Triple
T3006921
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Château Lafleur |
E81924
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalBlendShare |
P44611
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 50% Merlot |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 50% Merlot | Statement: [Château Lafleur, typicalBlendShare, approximately 50% Merlot]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalBlendShare Context triple: [Château Lafleur, typicalBlendShare, approximately 50% Merlot]
-
A.
typicalBlendStyle
Indicates the usual or characteristic way in which two or more elements are combined or mixed together.
-
B.
typicalBlendPartner
Indicates that two entities are commonly or characteristically combined or mixed together as standard or usual partners.
-
C.
typicalIn
Indicates that something commonly occurs, appears, or is found within a given context, category, or environment.
-
D.
typicalFlavor
Indicates that something characteristically has or is associated with a particular flavor.
-
E.
typicalVariety
Indicates that one entity is a representative or characteristic example of the variety or type defined by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1c4de88190a83b7cefaa1f2842 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad9a48f0888190bdec150dac623851 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad96180eb08190a524c5f458d41382 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ad97f6af3881909f4547967384114c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3 p.m.