Triple

T30068748
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clarinda E764114 entity
Predicate correspondencePartnerPseudonym P171066 FINISHED
Object Sylvander NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sylvander | Statement: [Clarinda, correspondencePartnerPseudonym, Sylvander]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: correspondencePartnerPseudonym
Context triple: [Clarinda, correspondencePartnerPseudonym, Sylvander]
  • A. addresseePseudonym chosen
    Indicates that the referenced name is a pseudonym used for the addressee in the context of the described communication or interaction.
  • B. associatedName
    Indicates that one entity has an alternative or related name that is linked or connected to another entity.
  • C. pseudonymForRole
    Indicates that a pseudonym is used specifically when an entity is acting in a particular role or capacity.
  • D. usedPseudonym
    Indicates that an entity performed an action or participated in a context under a name that was not their real or primary identity.
  • E. isPartlyKnownAs
    Indicates that an entity is known by a particular name or label in some, but not all, contexts or sources.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2247221388190a13a22c47094a0ef completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d6a6b04c8190bee4cf9c00665ef7 completed May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d26ceb08819091c71c001e954936 completed May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7 p.m.