Triple

T30064083
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Donald L. Kirkpatrick E763977 entity
Predicate modelUsedIn P158185 FINISHED
Object corporate training evaluation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: corporate training evaluation | Statement: [Donald L. Kirkpatrick, modelUsedIn, corporate training evaluation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modelUsedIn
Context triple: [Donald L. Kirkpatrick, modelUsedIn, corporate training evaluation]
  • A. modelIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation or simulation of another entity.
  • B. engineUsedIn
    Indicates that a particular engine is utilized as a component or power source within a specified system, device, or application.
  • C. usedInDeviceModel
    Indicates that something (such as a component, material, or technology) is utilized within or incorporated into a particular device model.
  • D. model
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, example, or simulation of another entity or concept.
  • E. hardwareUsedBy
    Indicates that a piece of hardware is utilized or operated by a particular entity (such as a person, system, or organization).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2247221388190a13a22c47094a0ef completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67ca5a1008190880f6da9f69c263b completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f673c664f08190b4d66cdc305e10db completed May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:58 p.m.