Triple
T300627
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RESTCONF |
E6188
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsDatastoreType |
P11254
|
FINISHED |
| Object | running configuration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: running configuration | Statement: [RESTCONF, supportsDatastoreType, running configuration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDatastoreType Context triple: [RESTCONF, supportsDatastoreType, running configuration]
-
A.
supportsProjectType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
-
B.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
C.
supportsFeature
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
D.
supportsAccountType
Indicates that one entity is compatible with, or able to operate for, a specified type or category of account.
-
E.
hasSupported
Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea2fba548190a5aeb1597dca96bd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e93aff048190a633c8ae2b76a41f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea2af1388190b93235602ace679e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.