Triple

T30053506
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ken Norton vs. George Foreman E763662 entity
Predicate styleOfForeman P170444 FINISHED
Object aggressive power punching LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aggressive power punching | Statement: [Ken Norton vs. George Foreman, styleOfForeman, aggressive power punching]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleOfForeman
Context triple: [Ken Norton vs. George Foreman, styleOfForeman, aggressive power punching]
  • A. inTheStyleOf
    Indicates that one entity is created, performed, or presented in a manner that imitates or closely resembles the characteristic style of another entity.
  • B. styleTendsTo
    Indicates that one style is generally inclined or likely to develop, appear, or be adopted in the direction of another style.
  • C. styleOfCrime
    Indicates the particular manner, method, or characteristic pattern in which a crime is committed.
  • D. styleOfEldestSon
    Indicates the characteristic manner, behavior, or presentation specifically associated with the eldest son in a given context.
  • E. clanChiefStyle
    Indicates the formal title or style used to address or refer to the chief of a clan.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224716378819087a722e487832b70 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69063edbc81909e7735954aabee0b completed May 3, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f68b7b03488190b1db5fde4c7dd6e5 completed May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f68f6584a88190a8c4d95c0c84bee9 completed May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:56 p.m.