Triple
T30053459
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali I |
E763661
|
entity |
| Predicate | rematchPlanned |
P168393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali I, rematchPlanned, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rematchPlanned Context triple: [Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali I, rematchPlanned, yes]
-
A.
rematchDate
Indicates the date on which a subsequent or repeat contest between the same parties is scheduled or took place.
-
B.
isRematchOfFinal
Indicates that a match is a subsequent encounter replaying the same opponents and stakes as a previous final match.
-
C.
wasRematchOf
Indicates that an event or contest is a subsequent encounter between the same parties, held as a repeat of a previous matchup.
-
D.
rescheduledLosingTeam
Indicates that the team which originally lost had its game or match moved to a different time or date.
-
E.
opponentInComeback
Indicates that an entity serves as the opposing side or competitor in a situation characterized as a comeback (e.g., recovering from a disadvantage).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224716378819087a722e487832b70 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67a18676081908488b1e38d156284 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c664f08190b4d66cdc305e10db |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6749f205c81909d1aacf462912eee |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:56 p.m.