Triple
T30053441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali I |
E763661
|
entity |
| Predicate | judgeDecision |
P151594
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2–1 in favor of Ken Norton |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2–1 in favor of Ken Norton | Statement: [Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali I, judgeDecision, 2–1 in favor of Ken Norton]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judgeDecision Context triple: [Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali I, judgeDecision, 2–1 in favor of Ken Norton]
-
A.
judge
Indicates that one entity evaluates, forms an opinion about, or makes a decision regarding another entity or situation.
-
B.
judgeFrom
Indicates that one entity forms an opinion, evaluation, or conclusion about something based on another specified source, basis, or perspective.
-
C.
judgeInTrial
Indicates that an entity serves as the judicial authority presiding over and making legal determinations in a specific trial.
-
D.
judgmentResult
chosen
Indicates the outcome or decision produced by a judgment, such as a court ruling, evaluation, or formal assessment, regarding the entities involved.
-
E.
decisionHolding
Indicates that an entity has made, issued, or is responsible for a particular formal decision or ruling.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224716378819087a722e487832b70 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67a18676081908488b1e38d156284 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c664f08190b4d66cdc305e10db |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:56 p.m.