Triple

T30045298
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cedar Bridge (reconstructed) E763434 entity
Predicate hasRestorationPurpose P202044 FINISHED
Object preservation of historic significance LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: preservation of historic significance | Statement: [Cedar Bridge (reconstructed), hasRestorationPurpose, preservation of historic significance]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRestorationPurpose
Context triple: [Cedar Bridge (reconstructed), hasRestorationPurpose, preservation of historic significance]
  • A. hasRestoration
    Indicates that an entity has undergone, is undergoing, or is associated with a process of repair, renewal, or restoration.
  • B. hasRestorationApproach
    Indicates the method or strategy used to restore or rehabilitate something to a desired state.
  • C. hasRestorationActivities
    Indicates that an entity carries out, is involved in, or is associated with actions aimed at restoring or rehabilitating another entity or resource.
  • D. hasReconstructionPurpose
    Indicates that something exists or is performed with the specific aim or function of reconstruction (e.g., rebuilding, restoring, or re-creating something).
  • E. hasRestorationWorkBy
    Indicates that an entity has undergone restoration work carried out by a specified agent or party.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22470a89c8190be7273297c0e0d19 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0049e40d60819081e3899d8d9fca51 completed May 10, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0048c47b548190ad31b2901cc3784a completed May 10, 2026, 8:58 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a0049e352248190b0a0bb7dfe572c2c completed May 10, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:54 p.m.