Triple
T30026764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Competition Commission |
E762899
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesCompetitionLaw |
P81698
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Competition Act 1998 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Competition Act 1998 | Statement: [Competition Commission, appliesCompetitionLaw, Competition Act 1998]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesCompetitionLaw Context triple: [Competition Commission, appliesCompetitionLaw, Competition Act 1998]
-
A.
appliesToCompetition
Indicates that something (such as a rule, condition, or attribute) is relevant or applicable specifically to a competition.
-
B.
appliedLawFrom
chosen
Indicates that a specific law or legal provision was applied or derived from a particular source, context, or jurisdiction in a legal decision or situation.
-
C.
appliesLawThrough
Indicates that one entity enforces, implements, or carries out a law or legal rule by means of another entity or mechanism.
-
D.
appliesLicensingLaw
Indicates that a particular licensing law is enforced upon or governs the subject entity in relation to the object entity or activity.
-
E.
usesCompetition
Indicates that one entity employs or leverages another entity as a competitor or within a competitive context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246ee6e48190b69e837b913b398a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fda5003cdc8190a558501271389912 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 8:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fda05bfc2c819096821a5300e9bb24 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 8:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:48 p.m.