Triple
T30024348
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Evolver |
E762837
|
entity |
| Predicate | isRemixAlbumOf |
P132211
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Grid discography |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Grid discography | Statement: [Evolver, isRemixAlbumOf, The Grid discography]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isRemixAlbumOf Context triple: [Evolver, isRemixAlbumOf, The Grid discography]
-
A.
hasRemixRelationshipWith
chosen
Indicates that one creative work is a remix, reworked version, or derived adaptation of another work.
-
B.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
C.
isRemixWith
Indicates that one creative work is a remix created in collaboration with, or incorporating elements from, another specific work.
-
D.
isRemixReleaseTypicalOf
Indicates that a given remix release exemplifies or is characteristic of the usual or standard way remix releases are produced or presented for that entity.
-
E.
isAcousticReimaginingOf
Indicates that one work is an acoustic reinterpretation or rearranged version of another existing work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246ee6e48190b69e837b913b398a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f679a9e95081908aecded7962e0c87 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66ec9919881908a187bfc7c4df192 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:48 p.m.