Triple

T30021212
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stefan Nemanjić E762744 entity
Predicate religiousNameOfSibling P34795 FINISHED
Object Saint Sava NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Saint Sava | Statement: [Stefan Nemanjić, religiousNameOfSibling, Saint Sava]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: religiousNameOfSibling
Context triple: [Stefan Nemanjić, religiousNameOfSibling, Saint Sava]
  • A. siblingCharacterName
    Indicates that one character’s name is that of a sibling of another character.
  • B. siblingOrRelative
    Indicates that two entities are related to each other by blood, marriage, or family ties, including but not limited to being siblings.
  • C. religiousNamesake chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the religiously significant figure, concept, or object after which the other entity is named.
  • D. siblingPseudonymOf
    Indicates that one pseudonym is used by a person who is closely associated with, but distinct from, the person using another pseudonym, in a way analogous to a sibling relationship between the identities.
  • E. hasSiblingDeity
    Indicates that one deity is a sibling (sharing at least one parent) of another deity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2246ee6e48190b69e837b913b398a completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdec5ffe088190ac5505f26c6cff18 completed May 8, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdeae15f1c81908fc63fbc1b028d2e completed May 8, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:47 p.m.