Triple

T3001945
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject C.A. Thayer E81806 entity
Predicate underwentMajorRestoration P8589 FINISHED
Object 2000s LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2000s | Statement: [C.A. Thayer, underwentMajorRestoration, 2000s]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underwentMajorRestoration
Context triple: [C.A. Thayer, underwentMajorRestoration, 2000s]
  • A. majorRestorationLocation
    Indicates the primary place where a significant restoration or refurbishment of an object, structure, or work was carried out.
  • B. reconstructionOrRestorationDate chosen
    Indicates the date on which an entity was reconstructed or restored after damage, alteration, or deterioration.
  • C. largelyRebuilt
    Indicates that an entity has been substantially reconstructed or renovated, with most of its original structure replaced or significantly altered.
  • D. restorationEvent
    Indicates an event in which something previously altered, damaged, or degraded is returned to a former or improved state.
  • E. oversawConstructionOrRestorationOf
    Indicates that one entity supervised, directed, or managed the building, renovation, or restoration of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1c4de88190a83b7cefaa1f2842 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9a11b4bc81909ce06121361b4e0f completed March 8, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9615fefc8190ad96da92519cb7a3 completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:59 p.m.