Triple

T30011744
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Day E762480 entity
Predicate hasNameOriginAssociationWith P175345 FINISHED
Object Dayton, Nevada NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dayton, Nevada | Statement: [John Day, hasNameOriginAssociationWith, Dayton, Nevada]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNameOriginAssociationWith
Context triple: [John Day, hasNameOriginAssociationWith, Dayton, Nevada]
  • A. hasNameOrigin
    Indicates that the origin or source of an entity’s name is specified by the related entity.
  • B. hasNameEtymologyIn
    Indicates that the origin or derivation of an entity’s name is based in, or traceable to, a specified source such as a language, place, or cultural context.
  • C. originAssociatedWith
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, derived from, or influenced by a particular origin, source, or point of beginning.
  • D. hasNameOriginType
    Indicates that there is a specific type or category describing the origin of an entity’s name.
  • E. hasOnomasticRelation chosen
    Indicates that there is a relationship between entities based on names, naming patterns, or shared onomastic (name-related) features.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2246b0c84819094f1250b6a02d277 completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd82ed2a4c81908bd7797fbd2e3d08 completed May 8, 2026, 6:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd814cc10481908e4f8123d35a5d0c completed May 8, 2026, 6:23 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:44 p.m.