Triple
T30005768
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Flame 2000 |
E762307
|
entity |
| Predicate | isKnownWithin |
P118061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | club and remix circles |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: club and remix circles | Statement: [The Flame 2000, isKnownWithin, club and remix circles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isKnownWithin Context triple: [The Flame 2000, isKnownWithin, club and remix circles]
-
A.
isKnownInContextOf
chosen
Indicates that an entity is recognized, relevant, or has significance specifically within a given context or domain.
-
B.
hasReferentKnownFor
Indicates that the referent (the thing being referred to) is known or notable for a particular characteristic, role, or achievement.
-
C.
knownToBe
Indicates that one entity is recognized or acknowledged as being a certain way, having a certain property, or fitting a particular description by others.
-
D.
existsWithin
Indicates that one entity is located inside the spatial, temporal, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
-
E.
knownToHoldFor
Indicates that a certain condition, property, or relation is confirmed to be valid or applicable for the specified entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246a47ac81909cf5213053687ffc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6795282648190a8351e4cbace98d3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66ec9919881908a187bfc7c4df192 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:42 p.m.