Triple
T2998693
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Purim Katan |
E81132
|
entity |
| Predicate | omitsEulogies |
P38835
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Purim Katan, omitsEulogies, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: omitsEulogies Context triple: [Purim Katan, omitsEulogies, true]
-
A.
notRecitedOn
Indicates that a particular text, prayer, or recitation was not performed or spoken on a specified occasion, time, or context.
-
B.
excludes
Indicates that one entity deliberately omits, leaves out, or does not allow the inclusion of another entity within a set, group, or context.
-
C.
excludesLiturgicalPractice
chosen
Indicates that one entity omits, forbids, or does not incorporate a particular liturgical practice in its religious or ritual context.
-
D.
excludesLiturgicalColor
Indicates that a particular liturgical color is not permitted or is intentionally omitted in a given liturgical context, usage, or celebration.
-
E.
notableAbsence
Indicates that something or someone is conspicuously missing from a context where their presence would normally be expected or significant.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b187fc8819085914d3c9ea3142d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad99f766408190a5591efce8346bb9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9615fefc8190ad96da92519cb7a3 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:59 p.m.