Triple

T299862
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Classic Mac OS E6173 entity
Predicate brandingChange P6643 FINISHED
Object System 7 renamed to Mac OS 7.6 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: System 7 renamed to Mac OS 7.6 | Statement: [Classic Mac OS, brandingChange, System 7 renamed to Mac OS 7.6]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandingChange
Context triple: [Classic Mac OS, brandingChange, System 7 renamed to Mac OS 7.6]
  • A. brand
    Indicates that one entity is the commercial brand or label under which another entity (such as a product, service, or organization) is marketed or identified.
  • B. brandingScope
    Indicates the extent or range within which a particular brand identity, strategy, or elements are applied or recognized.
  • C. brandPositioning
    Indicates how a brand is strategically placed and perceived in the minds of its target audience relative to competitors.
  • D. successorBranding chosen
    Indicates that one brand has replaced or continued another brand as its subsequent or updated identity.
  • E. formerBrand
    Indicates that an entity was previously used or recognized as a brand for another entity but is no longer its current brand.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea0dd1dc8190aecd5afdeb2fd74b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e9398df08190af40063a2de7a1d0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.